Skip to main content

Care of the Late Preterm Consensus (2024)

Care of the Late Preterm Consensus (2024)

Reviewed by Sarvin Ghavam, MD Elizabeth G. Salazar, MD, MSHP

Reviewed on

Care of the Late Preterm Consensus 

Evidence based, expert aided Guidelines for Care of the Late Preterm Neonate

Gestational Age: 34+0 to 36+6 weeks

Date of Initial Publication: October 2024

Date of Reviews

Authors

Amy Cohen, MD, Nadege Brutus, DO, Stephanie Grayson, MD, Michelle Kelly, MD, Kirstie Marcello Donnelly, MD, Joseph Asaro, DO, Maureen Dowling RD, Melissa Weissman APN, Jonathan Knowlton MD, Mark Castera MD, Purvi Kapadia Jethva, MD, Jason Burgess ANC, Anna Sosnovski MD, Adriana Jepsen MD, Thomas Habib MD, Sam Garber MD, Allie Pulsifer APN, Colleen Flounder RD, Amy Lembeck DO, Shehla Siddiqui MD, Courtney Merchant MD, Hannah Chalal MD, Lori Christ MD, Betsy Salazar MD, Joanna Parga Belinkie MD, Lottie Chapman APN, Jennifer Peterman RN, JoAnn Blaser RN, Sharon Hangliter RD, Jill Cummins RD, Jacki Kroons RD, Jennifer Tioseco MD, Sherry Thrash RD, Alina Ivashchuk MD, Stacy Greblick RN, Jherna Balany MD, Michelle Kwok PA, Melissa Micallef MD, Diana Yanni MD, Dave Carola MD, Hayato Unno MD, Erin Price OTD, Sarvin Ghavam MD

Communicating Author(s): Sarvin Ghavam MD, Betsy Salazar MD, Sherry Thrash RD 

Background

The care of the late preterm neonate is diverse as the population it applies to. Late preterm neonates consist of neonates born from 34 + 0/7 weeks gestation to 36 + 6/7 weeks gestation. Late preterm neonates compromise a large proportion of neonatal intensive care admissions and their care tends to have large inter and intragroup variation among medical care providers. Consistency of care has been proven to improve neonatal outcomes and this regional consensus sought to find agreement in late preterm care regarding admission policy, respiratory care, definition of significant cardiopulmonary episodes and discharge criteria.

Consensus goals

  • Providing consistent care to the late preterm population across the Mother Baby to Neonatal Care units.
  • Defining unified criteria for admission and discharge.
  • Consistent feeding and nutritional care parameters. 

Abstract

This consensus involved over 25 local hospitals including the CHOP Newborn Care Network, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, Temple University Hospital, Cooper Hospital, and Christiana Care Hospital. With high consensus levels, local consensus was that late preterm neonates born greater than 36 weeks have automatic admission to the Mother-Baby Unit (MBU)/Well Baby Nursery (WBN); neonates born in the 35-week gestation age range could have a trial of admission directly to the MBUs (based highly on local practice and comfort) and neonates born less than 35 weeks’ gestation should have direct admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). 

Guidance on further clarification of admission criteria as well as discharge criteria were agreed upon, including definition for significant cardiopulmonary event in the late preterm gestation as well as minimum length of stay prior to discharge for neonates having cardiopulmonary events in the late preterm population. 

Specific recommendations for nutritional support for these neonates was developed based on current available literature in order to insure proper growth, caloric and vitamin needs. Late preterm infants, born between 34- and 36-weeks’ gestation, account for approximately 75% of all preterm births yet there are minimal published guidelines directing best feeding practices. Studies have shown that compared to their term counterparts, they are at a higher risk for developing complications such as hypoglycemia, oral feeding difficulties, nutrient deficits, and inadequate weight gain. Delayed intervention and inadequate nutrition support can prolong hospital stays and contribute to poorer short- and long-term health outcomes. Nutritional needs within the late preterm population inversely correlate with both gestational age and birth weight. Care plans should be tailored to meet metabolic needs and compensate for developmental delays associated with prematurity. Utilizing a structured framework for nutrition recommendations can improve outcomes by supporting breastfeeding, guiding supplementation and formula selection when needed, and outlining strategies for monitoring growth parameters. 

Consensus was reached on unified car seat test failure criteria, which includes desaturations of <90% for greater than 20 seconds and bradycardia less than 80 bpm (*specific outliers defined). Unified thermoregulation guidelines were developed for the subpopulation of late preterm neonates both within the NICU and in the Mother Baby Units, including radiant warmer fails and criteria for NICU transfers. Recommendations for antenatal steroids based on ACOG recommendations and in conjunction with OB-GYN colleagues were developed, along with respiratory care guidelines, use of CPAP as initial mode for respiratory support as well as the indications for surfactant use. 

The late preterm neonate population is a large proportion of NICU admissions and often a source of variation in care by practitioners; this consensus was able to reach strong consensus around several key factors driving the care of this population. 

Initial Care of the Late Preterm Neonate

Automatic Admission to the NICU recommended for 

  • All neonates born less than 35 weeks GA
    • Please see GA criteria below
  • Birthweight < 2 kg
    • Provider discretion can be used
  • Need for respiratory support
  • Failed CCHD Test
  • Require Dextrose containing IVF secondary to hypoglycemia

Strong consideration for Admission to NICU 

  • Feeding difficulties, significant weight loss from birthweight (BW)
    • Weight loss of >10% from BW
  • Temperature instability unable to be addressed in MBU/WBN
    • Temperature stability is vital, recommendation for transfer to NICU if neonate requires more than 2 instances of a warmer bed (fails open crib)
  • Significant apnea, cyanosis, desaturation episode noted in MBU/WBN
    • Witnessed color change episode (considerations can be made if directly related to a feeding event).
    • Neonates monitored on a pulse oximeter or monitor in an MBU/WBN setting with significant changes in heart rate or pulse ox limits, or witnessed apneic episodes

Consideration for Admission to NICU based on local hospital policies/structure

  • Need for IV antibiotics secondary to sepsis evaluation
  • Treatment for NOWS/NAS
  • Failed car seat test
    • Consider discussion with Neonatology 

Admission by Gestational Age Criteria

34 to 34+6 wk GA

  • Automatic admission to NICU

35 and 35+6 wk GA

  • Based on local clinical data, consideration can be given to admitting 35 week GA neonates born greater than 2kg to the MBU/WBN
    • If admitted to the MBU/WBN, a minimum hospital stay of 48 hours is recommended
      • In conjunction with local MBU/WBN and Maternal/OBGYN practices
    • Specific MBU/WBN criteria for acceptable feeding must be predetermined
    • Recommendation for breastfeeding (if parental choice) followed by supplementation with pumped breastmilk, donor milk (if available or based on unit policy) or formula
    • Glucose monitoring during the first 24- 48 hours life is recommended
  • If admitted to the NICU as per individual NICU discretion, would consider transfer to MBU/WBN following a suggested 12-24 hours observation if neonate shows
    • Stable temperatures without need of radiant warmer or incubator
    • Acceptable blood glucoses
    • Acceptable feeding with breastfeeding and supplementation, as per parental desires
    • Stable respiratory status without noted desaturations, apnea or bradycardia episodes

36 to 36+6 weeks

Automatic Admission to MBU/WBN for all neonates born greater than 36 weeks and >2kg

  • Transition to NICU is recommended for those neonates that meet any of the criteria for NICU admission

Admission and observation to the NICU is recommended

Significant Apnea, Bradycardia, Desaturation Episodes in MBU/WBN

  • Witnessed color change episode (considerations can be made if directly related to a feeding event).
    • Neonates monitored on a pulse oximeter or monitor in an MBU/WBN setting with significant changes in heart rate or pulse ox limits, or witnessed apneic episodes

Late Preterm Sepsis Evaluation Consensus Recommendations

For Neonates born 34-34+6 weeks GA

  • Consider the use of the EOS calculator with adjustment clinical exam markers to help decision for antibiotics administration
  • Delivery for maternal indications only without rupture of membranes and no other risk factors
    • May consider clinical monitoring in NICU if only mild to moderate respiratory support needs
    • Use of clinical judgement highly warranted
    • Per AAP Statement
      • Infants born preterm by cesarean delivery because of maternal noninfectious illness or placental insufficiency in the absence of labor, attempts to induce labor or ROM before delivery are relatively low risk of EOS. Depending the clinical condition of the neonate, physicians should consider the risk/benefit balance of an EOS evaluation and empirical antibiotic therapy

For Neonates born ≥ 35 weeks GA

  • Recommend Use of the Early Onset Sepsis Calculator
    • Consider re-evaluation of symptoms at 2 hours of life if well appearing neonate with elevated SRS >1
    • Consider the adjusted Clinical Risk Score 

Therapeutic Length of Antibiotics Therapy during a Sepsis Evaluation

  • Following evaluation for sepsis and treatment with ampicillin and gentamicin
  • Literature supports treatment for 36 hours using 3 doses of Q12hr dosing of ampicillin and 1 dose of gentamicin
    • 34 weeks: 1 dose of gentamicin
    • >35 weeks: 2 doses of gentamicin
  • Consideration for use of ampicillin q8 hours for 3 doses and 1 dose of gentamicin equaling 24 hours of total treatment (MIC reaches 48 threshold as early as 24 hrs)
    • 34 weeks 50mg/kg q12hrs
    • >35 weeks 50mg/kg q8 hrs
    • Consideration for 100mg/kg meningitic dosing can be made per local guidance
  • Neonates must remain in hospital for 48 hours of observation, even if antibiotic therapy is limited to 36 hours, in order give ample time for blood culture 

Late Preterm Neonatal Consensus Recommendations for Hyperbilirubinemia Management

For Neonates born 34 to 34+6 weeks GA

  • Recommendations to follow Stanford Hyperbilirubinemia thresholds
  • Threshold for phototherapy recommendations
    • Initiate phototherapy at total bilirubin (mg/dL) of 12 to 14
    • Or if available, consider use of nomograms with preterm phototherapy levels
  • For Neonate born ≥ 35 weeks GA please refer to the AAP Revised Guidelines Management of Hyperbilirubinemia in the Newborn Infant 35 or More Weeks of Gestation (2022)
    • When possible and neonate stable, consider in-room phototherapy 

Nutrition Recommendation for Late Preterm Neonates

 High Risk InfantsModerate Risk InfantsLower Risk Infants
Gestational Age (wks) / Size/Weight34-34 6/7 / Less than 2kg35-35 6/7 / 2- 2.5 kg36-36 6/7 / Large for Gestational Age
Initial FeedingsMaternal milk; Donor milk*; Human Milk Fortifier; Preterm Transitional Formula Maternal milk; Donor milk*; Preterm Transitional Formula 
BreastfeedingDirect breastfeed (max 15 min) Direct breastfeeding ad lib
SupplementationSupplement using bottle or gavageSupplement using bottle, cup, spoon, or syringe
Offer supplementation based on infant cues and lab values; Mandatory supplementation via NG or bottle for >10% weight loss or hypoglycemia based on blood glucose algorithm
Goal 24 Hour Intake (estimated)Minimum of 60 ml/kg/day by 48 hours of life5-10 mL/feed by 36 hours of life; 15 ml or more by 72 hours of life           Ad lib
Total Fluid Goal150-160 ml/kg; Initiate gavage feeds for intakes below 120 ml/kg at 96 hours of life or if infant is unable to maintain weight or blood glucose levels with bottle supplementation
Step-wise advance of 30-40 ml/kg/day (consider splitting into two advances daily)
Discharge FeedsTransitional formula mixed to 24 cal/oz; Human milk enriched to 24 cal/oz using transitional formula powder; Unfortified human milk/breastfeed with 4-6 bottles of 24 cal/oz transitional formula or maternal milk enriched to 24 cal/oz with transitional formula Transitional formula (22 cal/oz); Unfortified human milk/breastfeed with 4 bottles of transitional formula (22 cal/oz); Human milk enriched to 22 cal/oz using transitional formula powder; Unfortified human milk/breastfeed with 2-4 bottles of 24 cal/oz transitional formula or maternal milk enriched to 24 cal/oz with transitional formula Transitional formula (22 cal/oz); Unfortified human milk/breastfeed supplemented with 2 bottles of transitional formula daily (22 cal/oz); Unfortified human milk/breastfeed with 2-4 bottles of maternal milk enriched to 22 cal/oz using transitional formula powder 
*Infant should be transitioned to home feeding plan no less than 24 hours prior to discharge; do not send infant home on donor milk unless parents are able to obtain it post discharge
Feeding NotesTerm formulas are not recommended; If infant displays an intolerance to feeds recommend a trial of another transitional formula, prior to using a specialized term formula; Monitor weight trend closely on the Fenton growth chart until 50 weeks PMA (goal gain of ~30-35 g/day); If weight gains begin to falter, increase the caloric density of feedings by 2 cal/oz; Recommend use of increased calorie feeds until at least corrected term (and maintaining optimal growth)
Vitamin/Mineral Supplementation after DischargeSupplemental iron and Vitamin D (via separate supplements or multi-vitamin with iron) for a daily intake of 400 IU vitamin D and 2-3 mg/kg of iron including feeds
Estimated Nutrient Needs (after 72 hours of life)
Fluid; Calories; Protein135-180 mL/kg/day; 120-130 kcal/kg/day; 3-3.5  g/kg/day135-180 mL/kg/day; 115-125 kcal/kg/day; ≥ 2.5-3 g/kg/day135-180 mL/kg/day; 110-120 kcal/kg/day; ≥ 2-3  g/kg/day
Post Discharge Laboratory Monitoring25 OH Vitamin D level, serum hemoglobin, hematocrit, and reticulocyte/ferritin level at 2-3 months chronological age

Transitional Formula: (Similac NeoSure 22 cal/oz or Enfamil NeuroPro EnfaCare 22 cal/oz)

Vitamin and Iron Supplementations:

Iron Recommendations

BW  2000-2500g, the recommended iron intake is 1-2mg/kg/d up to 6 months of age

BW < 2000g, the recommended iron intake is 2-3mg/kg/d at least up to 6 months of age

*Start by 2-4 weeks of life

Vitamin D Recommendations

Recommend at least 400 IU (total intake including feeds) 

*Start when on full feeds 

If recommending multivitamin

For Breastmilk/Breastfeeding neonates 1ml of Polyvisol with Iron (for maximum of 4mg/kg/d of iron)

For formula fed neonates 0.5ml of Polyvisol with Iron (for maximum of 4 mg/kg/d of iron) 

*Start by discharge preparation 

Late Preterm Respiratory Care Guidelines

Antenatal Steroid Use in Late Preterm Neonates

Consider shared decision making and discussion with OBGYN/MFM colleagues for maternal corticosteroids for women between 34+0 and 36+6 weeks of pregnancy that are likely to deliver prior to 37+0 weeks.  Consider excluding women with pre-gestational diabetes secondary to increased risk for neonatal hypoglycemia.

If maternal corticosteroid administration prior to delivery, recommendation for glucose monitoring in the late preterm neonate until minimum of 24 of hours of age.

**Please see summary of Antenatal Steroid Use in a Late Preterm Neonate below. 

Recommendations for Respiratory Support in a Late Preterm

  • For late preterm neonates demonstrating respiratory distress (as defined by the criteria listed below), strong consideration for initiation of support with CPAP.
  • Consideration for High Flow Nasal Canula if mild respiratory distress or for weaning off of CPAP with improvement of respiratory symptoms.

Guidelines for consideration of Surfactant

  1. CPAP ≥ 6
  2. FIO2 ≥ 40%
  3. Arterial PH < 7.2
  4. Arterial PCO2 >60
  5. CXR consistent with RDS
  6. Clinical exam in conjunction with other physiologic abnormalities:
    1. Respiratory rate: Persistent tachypnea (RR>60)
    2. Grunting persistently
    3. Significant work of breathing and retractions
  7. Escalation of any of the symptoms listed above

Consider low threshold for administering surfactant when meeting several of the above criteria. 

Recommendations of providing early surfactant for patients meeting guidelines in a timely manner to avoid further respiratory decompensation. 

Surfactant Administration Methodologies:

Use of MIST or LISA is an acceptable method in providing surfactant to late preterm neonates.

INSURE method is common and safe practice to providing surfactant therapy. 

Recommendation to use local practice in providing surfactant. 

Late Preterm Discharge Recommendations

  • Late preterm neonates should show signs of physiologic stability prior to discharge home.
  • Late preterm neonates should demonstrate appropriate nutritional intake and weight gain per nutritional recommendations prior to discharge.
  • Late preterm neonates should pass a car seat test prior to discharge home.
  • Late preterm neonates should be free of significant apnea and bradycardia episodes for greater than 2-3 days prior to discharge home. 

Car Seat Test 

AAP Statement (2009)

Improved survival rates and earlier discharge of preterm (<37 weeks' gestation at birth) and low birth weight (<2500 g at birth) infants have increased the number of small infants who are being transported in private vehicles. Car safety seats that are used correctly are 71% effective in preventing fatalities attributable to passenger car crashes in infants. To ensure that preterm and low birth weight infants are transported safely, the proper selection and use of car safety seats.

The increased frequency of oxygen desaturation and episodes of apnea or bradycardia while sitting in car safety seats suggests that preterm infants should have a period of observation in a car safety seat, preferably their own, before hospital discharge. This period of observation should be performed with the infant carefully positioned for optimal restraint and the car safety seat placed at an angle that is approved for use in the vehicle. A period of observation for a minimum of 90 to 120 minutes or the duration of travel, whichever is longer, is suggested

Proposed Unified Car Seat Parameters:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Less than 37 week’s gestational age at birth.
  • Less than 2500 grams (per AAP recommendations, may use local considerations)
  • Other medical conditions which place the infant at risk for oxygen desaturation in a semi-upright position of a child car seat. (eg, hypotonia, craniofacial abnormalities)

Time

  • 90-120 minutes or the length of the car ride home, whichever is longer

Failure Criteria

  • Apnea: greater than 20 seconds cessation of respiratory effort
  • Bradycardia: less than 80 beats per minute, or 20 beats less than normal baseline sleeping rate for greater than 20 seconds
    • In the event of testing an infant with a known low resting heart rate, this could be changed with an MD order
    • In case of congenital heart disease saturation parameters for car seat test may modified by physician (consideration for 10% less than baseline oxygen saturation as indication for failure)
  • Desaturation: Oxygen less than 90% sustained greater than 20 seconds.

Failed Car Seat Test

  • In case of failure of the car seat challenge, must wait 24 hours prior to repeat testing.
  • In case of 2 failed car seat challenges, must be admitted to NICU/SCN and must wait another 24 hours prior to repeat testing.
ApneaBradycardiaOxygen DesaturationRepeat
>20 seconds<80 bpm or 20 bpm less than baseline for greater than 20 seconds< 90% for greater 20 seconds24 hrs after 1st Failure; 24 hrs in NICU after 2nd Failure

Cardiopulmonary Episodes in a Late Preterm Neonate

Apnea and Bradycardia 

  • Consideration for low heart limits for late preterm neonates at 80 bpm
  • Brief, isolated bradycardic episodes that spontaneously resolve and feeding-related events that resolve with interruption of feeding are common in convalescent preterm infants and generally need not delay discharge
  • Monitor late preterm neonates for a of 48 hours to 72 hours following an apnea or bradycardia episode NOT requiring stimulation prior to DC
    • Apnea: cessation of respirations for greater than 20 seconds with resulting desaturation <85% oxygen saturation
    • Bradycardia: Heart rate less than 80 bpm for greater than 20 seconds
    • High consensus was found for observation period of 72 hours following a significant apnea/bradycardia episode for a LPT neonate
  • Some additional literature suggests that late preterm infants with RDS are at a subsequent risk of higher apnea, so may merit some additional monitoring.
Heart RateDesaturation/Apnea TimeMonitor
<80<85%, 20 seconds 48-72 hours

Late Preterm Thermoregulation Recommendations

Subtopics: Bathing, Isolette Weaning, Radiant Warmer Use, Temperature Regulation in DR and MBU, Parental recommendations and AAP Sleep/Hat/Blanket policy

DR and MBU Recommendations

  • Infants should be delivered in ORs or DRs with goal room temperature of >70 degrees (21 Celsius)
    • This should be maintained, if possible during skin to skin, and in the immediate post-natal period
  • Drying should occur immediately following delivery prior to skin to skin and during delayed cord clamping. Infants should be thoroughly dried with hat applied prior to skin to skin.
  • When transporting, infants should have appropriate thermoregulation measures including an appropriately warmed transport device or adequately swaddled with pre-warmed blankets and hats.
  • Use local hospital policy in order to best maintain euthermia in the late preterm population, which is more at risk for temperature instability.
  • Closer monitoring of temperature is warranted especially in the first 24 hours of life.
  • “Golden Hour” of maintaining warmth following delivery (skin to skin, without interference assuming stability) 

Mother Baby Unit Radiant Warmer Recommendations

  • Maintain infant temperature between 36.5 to 37.5 Celsius
  • When temp noted to be <36.5 place infant skin to skin with hat and covered with a warmed blanket.
    • Monitor temp q30 min until normothermic.
    • If unable to perform skin to skin add blanket and head covering
    • Consider removing head covering once euthermia is established and monitoring prior to discharge
    • If temperature remains low (< 36.5 C) after 1 hour, move to preheated radiant warmer
  • If required, place on Radiant Warmer and set temp 36.5 on skin servo control
    • Skin probe over upper quadrants of abdomen to avoid brown fat stores
    • Monitor temp and vital signs q 30 min.
    • May increase set temp to 37 Celsius if temperature is not improving
    • When normothermic x 1 hour, place infant skin to skin or swaddle with hat
      • Monitor temp q 30 min for 2 hrs to establish thermal stability
    • If unable to maintain or achieve euthermia over 1-2 hours please consult NICU for further recommendations
  • For temp 32-34.9 place infant in preheated isolette on skin servo control with set temperature of 36-36.5
    • Recommendation for NICU consultation and consider transfer to NICU
    • Check glucose

Late Preterm Bathing Policy

  • Postpone bathing until infant has achieved thermal and cardiorespiratory stability and is a minimum of 6 hours old.
    • Ideally, postponing bathing until up to 24 hours of age has been shown to positively impact rates of hypothermia, hypoglycemia, and exclusive breastfeeding.
    • If infant is born to an HIV positive mother, bathing as soon as possible after birth. Utilize aseptic technique before skin breaking procedures and consider early bathing for exposure to active HSV lesions, Hepatitis B or C.
  • Immersion and swaddle bathing are recommended over sponge bathing.
  • Water temperature and environment-
    • Ensure that bath-water temperature ranges from 38 °C to less than 40 °C (100 °F to less than 104 °F).
    • Consider using a thermometer to assess water temperature before bathing.
    • Recommended room temperature 26–28 °C (79–81 °F).
    • Minimize air currents and convective heat loss.
  • Place infant skin to skin after bath and cover with blanket or utilize appropriate rewarming measures.
  • Bath infant every few days.

Late Preterm Incubator Weaning 

Late preterm neonates requiring isolette for thermoregulation will require a wean to open crib prior to discharge. Follow local guidance on isolette use when placed in isolette.

Consideration for weaning process:

  • If on Servo control, and thermoneutral temperatures with incubator temperature reaching 29-30 degrees transition to Air control
  • Wean temperature by 0.5°C every 3 hours (as a maximum) until the air control temperature is at 28°C, with desired temperature between 36.5-37.5 for 6-12 hours.
  • Wean to open crib with appropriate clothing and hat (suggested t-shirt, single or double blanket or sleep sack)
  • Failure to wean into the open crib consists of axillary temperatures below 36.5 after corrective measures (adding a blanket and/or hat), increase apnea and/or bradycardia episodes, or change in clinical status. 

*Please refer to local guidelines for babies who LGA, SGA, IUGR, or other concerns when starting the isolette weaning process. 

AAP Hat Recommendations

  • For Late Preterm Neonates in Mother Baby Units
    • Secondary to concerns of overheating per AAP guidelines it is advised not to place hats on infants when indoor (exceptions are first few hours of life and while in the NICU)

Summary of Late Preterm Survey Process

In October 2023, we administered a 31-item online survey of late preterm care practices to NICU providers among 18 NICUs. Providers practiced at level II, III, and IV units. We obtained data from the following domains: admission criteria, discharge criteria, respiratory management, nutrition, infectious management, and thermoregulation. We used chi square and fisher exact tests with a threshold of p <0.05 to identify differences in responses between hospitals and provider types. We received 139 responses from 17 NICUs (estimated response rate 55%), including 70 attending neonatologists (50%), 24 fellows, nurse practioners, physician assistants, or hospitalists (17%), and 34 additional providers (24%). There was substantial provider-level variability in across all survey domains (Table 2). There was only over 70% agreement on 2 of the 11 proposed admission criteria, and 6 of the 10 proposed discharged criteria. There were significant differences between hospitals among the following variables: admission gestational age and birthweight, need for NICU admission for IV antibiotics and monitoring for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome, the observation period for apnea, preferred respiratory support, preferred surfactant administration method, indication for surfactant and supplementation, use of donor milk and dextrose gel, discharge criteria and weight, and use of the early onset sepsis calculator and sepsis management (Table 2). Between provider types, there were significant differences in automatic GA for admission, preferred form of respiratory support, preferred surfactant administration method, and discharge weight criteria (Table 2, Figure 1 D-E). 

Based on these initial survey results, we conducted 3 follow-up surveys in 2024 to resolve issues around which there was a substantial amount of variation in opinion and practice. Individuals were asked to indicate on a Likert scale of 1 to 9 how much they agreed with the following statements. Values over 6.5 indicated nearing consensus, and those over 7 indicated consensus was achieved. The results can be seen in the Table 1 below:

Table 1. Follow Consensus Survey 2024
QuestionMean Value
For LPT neonates demonstrating significant respiratory distress (persistent tachypnea (RR>60), grunting persistently, significant work of breathing and retractions) there should be strong consideration for initiation of support with CPAP.8.5
A significant, NON-feeding related episode for a late preterm neonate is Apnea (≥ 20s), HR <80 bpm, and Oxygen Saturation less than 85%.7.6
A significant, NON-feeding related "episode" for a late preterm neonate is:  Apnea (≥20s) which results in a Desaturation < 85% and/or Bradycardia with HR < 80 bpm. 7.9
What is the minimum observation period for a NON-feeding “episode” prior to discharge for a late preterm neonate? 72 hours 6.9
Monitoring late preterm neonates for a minimum of 48 hours following an apnea and bradycardia episode NOT requiring stimulation prior to discharge6.6
Car Seat Test Failure Criteria: Bradycardia <80 bpm, or 20 beats less than normal baseline sleeping rate7.5
Car Seat Test Failure Criteria: Oxygen desaturation < 90%, sustained > 20 seconds 7.0
Values over 6.5 indicated nearing consensus, and those over 7 indicated consensus was achieve.
Table 2: Summary of Overall Survey Responses Across All Survey Domains of Late Preterm Care
QuestionResponse N=139(%)QuestionResponse N=139(%)

Admission Criteria

Automatic NICU admission GA criteria§*

   < 34 0/7 weeks GA

   < 35 0/7 weeks GA

   < 36 0/7 weeks GA

    <37 0/7 weeks GA

6 (4)

88 (63)

44 (31)

1 (1)

109 (81)

Nutrition

What threshold do you use for higher caloric (>20 cal/oz) feeds? §*

   GA

    Birthweight

   10% Weight Loss

   15% Weight loss

   >10 days to regain of birthweight

   >15 days to regain birthweight

111 (80)

85 (61)

47 (33)

35 (25)

48 (35)

33 (24)

Presence of weight requirement for NICU

    Weight requirement for NICU§

    1800 g

    1900 g

    2000 g

    2200 g

    2500 g

     Other

4 (4)

2 (2)

88 (81)

9 (8)

1 (1)

4 (3)

What is your default to provide additional caloric infant for breastfeeding?*

   Transitional (22 kcal/oz)

   Preterm (22 kcal/oz)

   Preterm (24 kcal/oz)

   Term

   Human Milk Fortifier to Breastmilk

   Other

    Parental Preference

99 (71)

4 (3)

16 (11)

10 (7)

75 (54)

3 (2)

19 (13)

Do you have a minimum NICU monitoring time for a well 35 week infant?

    No Specific amount of time

    6 hours

   12 hours

   24 hours

   48 hours

   Other

78 (56)

3 (2)

11 (8)

34 (25)

4 (3)

8 (6)

Donor breastmilk is available for these indications: §

   SGA, low birthweight

    Parental request

    Hypoglycemia

   No donor milk available at my site

   NICU only

   All of the above

18 (14)

9 (7)

7 (5)

3 (2)

47 (35)

73 (53)

49 (37)

Length of observation after apnea event§

   12 hours

   18 hours

   24 hours

   36 hours

   48 hours

   Other

4 (3)

1 (1)

51 (37)

3 (2)

57 (42)

21 (15)

I routinely recommend triple feeding (breastfeeding, offering breastmilk, supplement formula).

Dextrose gel for these populations: §

   No, not in late preterm neonates

   Not at my hospital

   In >36 weeks GA and above

   In >35 weeks GA and above

   In all late preterm infants

   Other

4 (3)

20 (15)

22 (17)

52 (40)

29 (22)

  3 (2)   

Respiratory Care

Preferred method to initiate support§*

   CPAP

   RAM CPAP

   HFNC

   Wall Nasal Canula

    Other   

103 (79)

14 (11)

9 (7)

1 (1)

3 (2)

Discharge Criteria

Weight Criteria for Discharge Home§*

   1750g

   1800g

   1900g

   2000g  

    Weight for car seat test

   Other

4 (3)

68 (49)

3 (2)

8 (6)

48 (35)

2 (1)

92 (69)

Preferred method to give surfactant§*

   LISA, SALSA, MIST

    ENSURE

    Routine Administration

35 (28)

52 (41)

39 (31)

Presence of weight requirement for car seat test*

   Weight requirement for car seat test

   1800g

   1850g

   1900g

   2000g

   2200g

   2500g

   Other

 

36 (39)

10 (11)

1(1)

9(10)

1(1)

28 (30)

7 (8)

Thermoregulation

Implementation of AAP Hat Policy

How long do you delay a bath?

   None

   6 hours

   12 hours

   18 hours

   24 hours

     Other

46 (35)

 

23 (18)

24 (19)

20 (16)

1 (1)

46 (37)

12 (10)

86 (64)

 GA requirement for car seat test

  ≤ 35 weeks GA

  ≤ 36 weeks GA

  ≤ 37 weeks GA

  Other

  None

10 (8)

29 (22)

67 (50)

7 (5)

20 (15)

Admission to NICU for thermoregulation only

Sepsis

I use the EOS calculator in these groups: § +

    >34 weeks GA

    >35 weeks GA

    >36 weeks GA

   Other

   N/A

41 (31)

54 (42)

11 (8)

4 (3)

20 (15)

108 (84)

  

Automatic treatment for 34 wk GA requiring respiratory support§

Other

Phototherapy in the Well Baby Nursery

121 (90)  
Abbreviations: GA – Gestational Age; EOS – Early Onset Sepsis; NICU – Neonatal Intensive Care Unit; SGA – Small for gestational age §Indicates difference by hospital when comparing by chi square or Fisher exact test; *Indicates difference by provider type (attending neonatologist, mid-level provider (fellow, physician assistant, nurse practioner), and additional providers (nursing, physical and occupational therapy, speech therapy)

Late Preterm Sample Parent Brochure

Late Preterm Baby

Late preterm babies are babies born between 34 to 37 weeks of pregnancy. These babies aren't fully grown yet. The last 6 weeks of pregnancy are very important for the baby's brain, lungs, and other parts to grow. Sometimes, late preterm babies aren't quite ready to be born and might need extra care in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

Being Ready

Most late preterm babies usually do okay in the hospital, but they might have some trouble with:

  • Low blood sugars
  • Low temperatures
  • Feeding difficulties
  • Breathing troubles
  • Risk for infection
  • Jaundice (yellowing of the skin)

Late preterm babies will be watched closely and might need medicine, fluids through an IV (a tube in their vein), or help with breathing. Remember, your baby's brain is still growing and needs more time to get ready.

Low Blood Sugar

Sugar, called glucose, is very important for your baby's brain. Late preterm babies are more likely to have low blood sugar. Your medical team will check your baby's blood sugar often. Feeding your baby every 2 to 3 hours and giving them extra calories might help. If your baby's blood sugar stays low, they might need sugar through an IV or help feeding in the NICU.

Low Temperatures

Late preterm babies are more likely to get cold. It's important to:

  • Keep their room warm (around 70 degrees)
  • Keep them away from drafts
  • Spend lots of time skin-to-skin with a blanket
  • Dress your baby in one layer of clothes plus 1-2 snug blankets.
  • Delay bathing if possible until their temperature is normal 

Feeding Difficulties

Late preterm babies might need help with feeding. They need to eat more often, around 8 to 12 times a day, and you may have to wake the baby up if they try to sleep longer than 3 hours. If you’re breastfeeding, hold your baby skin-to-skin to help with milk production. You can talk to a lactation specialist for more help. Start expressing colostrum (early milk) within 6 hours of birth. Your care team can show you how to feed your baby. 

Your baby may need extra calories for help with growth, and sometimes may need to take more volume of feeds. Some babies may need NG tubes (a tube placed from the nose into the belly) to help receive feeds.

Once home, your baby’s doctor will keep a close eye on their growth and health. 

Breathing Difficulties

Most late preterm babies can breathe on their own, but sometimes they need extra help because their lungs are not fully developed. If your baby needs help breathing, your baby’s provider will explain the different ways they can support your baby's breathing.

Apnea of Prematurity

Apnea is when a baby's breathing slows down, which can also cause their heart rate to slow down (called bradycardia) or their oxygen levels to drop (called desaturation). Because your baby was born early, sometimes their brain doesn't send the signal to take a breath on time. This is called apnea of prematurity. Most babies outgrow apnea as they get more mature. Sometimes they might need medicine or help with breathing. Your baby's medical team will explain everything to you if your baby needs this help.

Risk for Infection

Late preterm babies are more at risk for infections in their blood (sepsis) because their immune systems are not fully developed yet. The medical team may want to test the blood for infections. 

To help prevent infections, 

  • Always wash your hands before touching your baby
  • Limit visitors to healthy people
  • Keep your baby’s surroundings clean,
  • Consider breastfeeding because breast milk has antibodies that protect against infections.

Jaundice

Late preterm babies might get jaundice, which makes their skin look yellow. Your baby’s jaundice levels will be checked. If your baby needs treatment, they will be placed under special lights called phototherapy. Your medical team will tell you the plan for going home.

Before You Go Home

Before your baby can go home, they need to:

  • Eat well.
  • Have normal blood sugar levels.
  • Keep their body temperature steady.
  • Be breathing comfortable without having apnea
  • Pass a car seat test.
  • Have normal jaundice levels.

Your baby’s doctor will check their growth and learning. Programs like Early Intervention (EI) can help if your baby needs extra support.

Questions When You Are Home

Parents of late preterm babies often have questions or concerns about their babies, especially if the baby had to go to the NICU. There are many groups and organizations that support parents. Check out these websites for more information.

LPT consensus qr code

Late Preterm Antenatal Steroid Summary Guide of Recommendations per Committee

Committee/SocietyAuthors/LinksSummary
SMFM 2021We recommend offering a single course of antenatal corticosteroids (2 doses of 12 mg of intramuscular betamethasone 24 hours apart) to patients who meet the inclusion criteria of the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids trial, ie, those with a singleton pregnancy between 34 0/7 and 36 6/7 weeks of gestation who are at high risk of preterm birth within the next 7 days and before 37 weeks of gestation (GRADE 1A).  We suggest consideration for the use of antenatal corticosteroids in select populations not included in the original Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids trial, such as patients with multiple gestations reduced to a singleton gestation on or after 14 0/7 weeks of gestation, patients with fetal anomalies, or those who are expected to deliver in <12 hours (GRADE 2C).  We recommend against the use of antenatal corticosteroids for fetal lung maturity in pregnant patients with a low likelihood of delivery before 37 weeks of gestation (GRADE 1B).  We recommend against the use of late preterm corticosteroids in pregnant patients with pregestational diabetes mellitus, given the risk of worsening neonatal hypoglycemia (GRADE 1C).  We recommend that patients at risk for late preterm delivery be thoroughly counseled regarding the potential risks and benefits of antenatal corticosteroid administration and be advised that the long-term risks remain uncertain (GRADE 1C).Reddy, U. M., Deshmukh, U., Dude, A., Harper, L., & Osmundson, S. S. (2021). Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #58: Use of antenatal corticosteroids for individuals at risk for late preterm delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 225(5), B36–B42 https://www.smfm.org/publications/427-smfm-consult-series-58-use-of-antenatal-corticosteroids-for-individuals-at-risk-for-late-preterm-delivery
ACOGA single course of betamethasone is recommended for pregnant women between 34 0/7 weeks and 36 6/7 weeks of gestation at risk of preterm birth within 7 days, and who have not received a previous course of antenatal corticosteroids.  Regularly scheduled repeat courses or serial courses (more than two) are not currently recommended.Committee on Obstetric Practice. (2017). Committee Opinion No. 713: Antenatal Corticosteroid Therapy for Fetal Maturation. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 130(2), e102–e109  https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2017/08/antenatal-corticosteroid-therapy-for-fetal-maturation#:~:text=A%20single%20course%20of%20betamethasone,previous%20course%20of%20antenatal%20corticosteroids
NICE 2015Consider maternal corticosteroids for women between 34+0 and 35+6 weeks of pregnancy who are in suspected, diagnosed or established preterm labour, are having a planned preterm birth or have P‑PROM.  
JOGC/SOGCWe continue to strongly recommend antenatal corticosteroid administration up to 33+6 weeks gestation when delivery is expected within 7 days (strong, high).  We have changed the upper gestational age boundary to which we strongly recommend antenatal corticosteroid administration from 34 0/7 to 33 6/7 weeks gestation (conditional, low.  For pregnant individuals at risk of delivery between 34 0/7 and 36 6/7 weeks gestation, we recommend considering antenatal corticosteroids based on discussion with patients about absolute harms and benefits specific to the gestational week (strong, moderate).  Between 34 0/7 and 36 6/7 weeks gestation, we do not recommend antenatal corticosteroids for pregnancies with pre-gestational diabetes in most cases. The greater risk of hypoglycemia in these pregnancies should be considered as part of the discussion on harms and benefits of antenatal corticosteroids (conditional, low).https://www.jogc.com/article/S1701-2163(22)00784-8/abstract https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1701216322007848
RCOGFor women undergoing planned caesarean birth between 37+0 and 38+6 weeks an informed discussion should take place with the woman about the potential risks and benefits of a course of antenatal corticosteroids. Although antenatal corticosteroids may reduce admission to the neonatal unit for respiratory morbidity, it is uncertain if there is any reduction in respiratory distress syndrome, transient tachypnoea of the newborn or neonatal unit admission overall, and antenatal corticosteroids may result in harm to the neonate which includes hypoglycaemia and potential developmental delay. [Grade B].  Corticosteroids should be offered to women between 24+0 and 34+6 weeks’ gestation in whom imminent preterm birth is anticipated (either due to established preterm labour, preterm prelabour rupture of membranes [PPROM] or planned preterm birth). [Grade A].  Women with twins and triplets should be offered targeted antenatal corticosteroids for early birth in line with recommendations for singletons. [Grade D].  Birth should not be delayed for antenatal corticosteroids if the indication for birth is impacting the health of the woman or her baby. [Grade GPP].  Antenatal corticosteroids should be offered to women with PPROM, who are at increased risk of preterm birth. [Grade A].  Antenatal corticosteroid use reduces neonatal death when the first dose is given within the 48 hours prior to birth. [Grade D].  Benefits are also seen when the first dose is given within 24 hours of birth and antenatal corticosteroids should still be given if birth is expected within this time. [Grade D]BJOG 2022; Antenatal corticosteroids to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality; https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1471-0528.17027 
WHOCautioned against universal adoption of ACS for pregnancies at risk of preterm birth at 34+0 to 36+6 weeks of gestation because it is unclear whether the short-term benefits (reduction in TTN) clearly outweigh the risks (neonatal hypoglycemia, unknowns about long-term neurodevelopmental outcome and metabolic risks) 

Late Preterm Literature Breathing

Article NameAuthor/Date of PublicationGrade of EvidenceResultsKey Conclusions
The effect of delaying first bathing on skin barrier function in late preterm infants: A study protocol for multi-centre, single-blind RCT

Taşdemir, H. İ., & Efe, E. (2021).

 

 

IIStudy in progress.  Objective: RCT 80 late preterm infants in multicentre Turkey NICUs.  Bath at 24-48 hrs compared to 48-72 hrs.  Bath performed at room temp then infant placed undressed in preheated incubator 
The effect of tub bathing and sponge bathing on neonatal comfort and physiological parameters in late preterm infants: A randomized controlled trialTaşdemir, H. İ., & Efe, E. (2019).  RCT 120 late preterm infants in Turkey NICU.  Compare tub bath versus sponge bath on physiologic parameters and comfortIITub bathing was more effective in reducing preterm infants’ comfort scores (9.47± 2.55  vs. 14.85 ± 4.77, p < 0.001) and heart rate than sponge bathing (132.88 ± 12.00 vs. 144.00 ± 17.74, p < 0.05).  Preterm infants in the tub bathing group maintained their body temperature better than those in the sponge bathing group (36.75 ± 0.26 vs. 36.59 ± 0.25, p < 0.05).  There was no difference in oxygen saturation (98.35 ± 0.88 vs. 97.85 ±1.36, p = 0.291) or respiratory rate (45.57 ± 5.39 vs. 47.20 ± 5.41, p = 0.472) between the tub and sponge bathing groups.Tub bathing had less of an impact on preterm infant comfort and heart rate than sponge bathing.  Preterm infants maintained body temperature better with tub bathing. 
Effects of Delayed Newborn Bathing on Breastfeeding, Hypothermia, and Hypoglycemia.Warren, S., Midodzi, W. K., Allwood Newhook, L. A., Murphy, P., & Twells, L. (2020). Retrospective Cohort Study. 1225 newborns >34 weeks gestation.  Compared bathing <24 hrs (typically 3.5 hrs) to bathing >24 hrs (typically 30 hrs). Newborns encouraged to be placed skin to skin after bathIIIAfter adjustment of total sample for confounders, the odds of exclusive breastfeeding at discharge were 33% greater in the postimplementation group than in the preimplementation group (adjusted odds ratio =1.334; 95% confidence interval [1.049,1.698]; p = .019).  When looking at the high risk (≤36 weeks, SGA, LGA, maternal DM) there was no significant difference in exclusive breastfeeding at discharge with regard to timing of bathing.  Delayed bathing was associated with decreased incidence of hypothermia and hypoglycemia in total sample (p =.007 and p = .003, respectively).  No association of delayed bathing with hypothermia in high-risk group (p=0.364).  Noted decrease in incidence of hypoglycemia in total sample and high-risk group (p=0.03, p=0.016).  We observed no difference in breastfeeding initiation between groups.Delayed bathing increased odds of exclusive breastfeeding, decreased incidence of hypthermia and hypoglycemia in total sample.  In high risk-group (≤36 weeks, SGA, LGA, maternal DM) no significant impact on exclusive breastfeeding hypothermia but there a statistically significant decrease in incidence of hypoglycemia. 
Neonatal skin care: Evidence-based clinical practice guidelineAWHONN 2018VIIEnsure that bath-water temperature ranges from 38 °C to less than 40 °C (100 °F to less than 104 °F).  Consider using a thermometer to assess water temperature before bathing.  Ensure that the roomtemperature is 26 °C–28 °C (79 °F–81 °F).  Close the door in the room where bathing takes place to minimize air currents and convective heat loss.  Ideally, infants should be bathed with immersion tub bathing or swaddled immersion bathing.  Provide the first infant bath after cardiorespiratory and thermal stability has been achieved.  Ideally, the first bath should occur between 6 and 24 hours of age.  For infants born to a mother who is HIV positive, the first bath should occur as soon as possible after birth.  For full-term infants who are not compromised, bathe after axillary temp is 36.8° or more (98.2 °F) on two consecutive measurements and the infant is at least 6 hours of age.  For the late preterm infant (34 0/7–36 6/7 weeks of gestation), postpone the first bath until thermal and cardiorespiratory stability is ensured.  Bathing should be delayed as long as possible, but at least until 6 hours of age and ideally until 12–24 hours of age.  Use appropriate rewarming measures after bathing, including skin-to-skin contact. Bathe the infant every few days using appropriate safety measures. 
Effectiveness of different bathing methods on physiological indexes and behavioral status of preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysisSun, X., Xu, J., Zhou, R., Liu, B., & Gu, Z. (2023).  11 RCTs with 828 preterm infants (median gestation age 30.8-36.1 weeks) in various countries.  Tub bathing, sponge bathing, swaddle bathingIThe results of meta-analysis showed that the body temperature and oxygen saturation of preterm infants in the sponge bath group were lower than those in conventional tub bath group (p<0.01). Heart rates were higher with sponge than those in conventional tub bath group(p=0.03).  Temperature and oxygen saturation of swaddle bath group were higher than those in conventional tub bath group (p<0.01, p=0.04). Respiratory rates were more stable with swaddle compared with infants in conventional tub bath(p<0.01). The crying duration, stress and pain scores of preterm infants in swaddle bath group were lower than those in conventional tub bath group(p<0.01, p<0.01, p<0.01)Sponge bath compared to tub bath- body temp, O2 sat and HR more desirable with tub bath. Swaddle bath compared to tub bath- temp, O2 sat, RR, stress and pain scores more desirable with swaddle bath
Early Interventions to Achieve Thermal Balance in Term NeonatesBedwell, S. & Holtzclaw, J. (2022). Nursing for Women’s Health, 26(5). VII Generally, for a healthy term neonate, bathing can begin between 6-24 hours of age.  A delay in bathing for the first 24 hrs has shown to positively affect newborn thermoregulation and glucose stability.  Improved thermal stability with us of immersion bathing versus sponge bathing. After bath, immediately dry and place skin to skin and cover with warm blanket or dress and wrap in warm blanket.
Tub bathing improves thermoregulation of the late preterm infant. Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursingLoring, C., Gregory, K., Gargan, B., LeBlanc, V., Lundgren, D., Reilly, J., Stobo, K., Walker, C., & Zaya, C. (2012). 100 late preterm infants in US. Initial bath under warming light between 24-36 hrs Infants who were tub bathed experienced significantly less variability in body temperature and overall were warmer 10 minutes and 30 minutes following the bath compared to infants who were sponge bathed (p = .024). 
WHO Recommendation on Newborn Health: Guidelines approved by the WHO Guidelines Review CommitteeWHO 2017VII Bathing should be delayed to after 24 hours of birth. If this is not possible at all due to cultural reasons, bathing should be delayed for at least 6 hours.
Guidelies for Perinatal Care 8th Ed. AAP 2017 Removal of blood and secretions from the skin may minimize risk of infection with potentially contaminating microorganisms such as Hep B, HSV, HIV.   In the absence of risk factors such as HIV postpone bath until at least breastfeeding has been initiated and thermal stability ensured. Bathing 12 HOL associated with higher rates of exclusive breastfeeding, whole body bathing may not be necessary. 
Risks of Infectious Diseases in Newborns Exposed to Alternative Perinatal PracticesNolt,D., O’Leary, S. T., Aucott, S. W. ; COMMITTEE ON INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN (2022)VIIThe only explicit AAP recommendation regarding bathing related to infectious risks is for infants exposed to HIV. For these infants, the Red Book recommends that the child be bathed and cleaned of secretions as soon as possible after birth. There is no mention of bathing for interruption of vertical transmission of other pathogens. Proper aseptic technique before any skin-breaking procedures should serve to reduce risk of transmission of pathogens to the neonate. Bathing should be initiated as soon as possible after delivery in cases in which newborn infants are exposed to active HSV genital lesions or when there is a known history of bloodborne pathogens (HIV, HBV, or hepatitis C virus).If infant is born to an HIV positive mother, bathing as soon as possible after birth. Utilize aseptic technique before skin breaking procedures and consider early bathing for exposure to active HSV lesions, or Hepatitis B or C. 

Late Preterm Thermoregulation Evidence Review

Article NameAuthor/Date of PublicationGrade of EvidenceResultsKey Conclusions
Maintaining normal temperature immediately after birth in late preterm and term infants: A systematic review and meta-analysisV.V. Ramaswamy et. al (2022)I25 RCTS, 10 non-RCTs. 23 °C compared to 20 °C improved normothermia [Risk Ratio (RR), 95% (CI): 1.26, 1.11–1.42)] and body temperature [Mean Difference (MD), 95% CI: 0.30 °C, 0.23–0.37 °C), and decreased moderate hypothermia (RR, 95% CI: 0.26, 0.16–0.42).  Skin to skin care (SSC) compared to no SSC increased body temperature (MD, 95% CI: 0.32, 0.10–0.52), reduced hypoglycemia (RR, 95% CI: 0.16, 0.05–0.53) and hospital admission (RR, 95% CI: 0.34, 0.14–0.83).Warmer rooms and SSC improved temperatures.  Certainty of evidence was low to very low for all outcomes.
Cold Stress and Hypoglycemia in the Late Preterm (“Near-Term”) Infant: Impact on Nursery of AdmissionAbbot and Jackson (2006)VIRetrospective Observation with expert opinion for quality control. 196 consecutive newborn infants from L and D to NN- 51% with core body temp within range in DR (27.5% were cold, 21.4% were warm) with lower temps noted on arrival to NNLPI may be cared for in different settings following birth and focus should be adjusted for each.  This threat extends through the first day of life.  Close monitoring should be performed.
Duration of skin-to-skin care and rectal temperatures in late preterm and term infantsKardum et al. (2022)VIDuration of S2S and infant temperature change after birth in suboptimal DR temperatures (35 weeks and older). 6 months, SVD to WBN, rectal temp after S2S measured, 688 babies.  Mean DR temp 21.7 (71.1) After S2S, 50.4% normothermic, 38% mildly hypothermic, 11.4% moderately hypothermic.  Mean S2S time 63.9 minutes.  S2S for <38 weeks was associated with a decrease in rectal temp.S2S in <38 weeks may not be enough in rooms with suboptimal temps to maintain euthermia
Does a Higher Ambient Temperature in the Delivery. Room Prevent Hypothermia in Preterm InfantsJohannsen et al. (2017)VICompared the rectal body temperature of VLBW infants on admission to the NICU, born in delivery rooms with an ambient temperature of 28°C vs. 34°C.  Higher ambient temperature in the delivery room results in a lower number of VLBW infants with hypothermia on admission (body temperature <36.5°C), but also an increase in hyperthermic (body temperature >37.5°C) preterm babies. A higher ambient temperature in the delivery room may also prevent hypothermia in preterm infants in addition to the above-mentioned methods to stabilize body temperature in VLBW infants. Further studies are essential to confirm these results and hence recommend an ideal temperature in the delivery room.
Newborn clinical outcomes of the awhonn late preterm infant research-based practice projectCooper et al. (2012)VI14 hospitals located through the United States and Canada.   Late preterm infants (802) 64% of LPIs initially cared for in a routine nursery, 10% were transferred to a special care unit or neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). More than one half of LPIs experienced hypothermia, hypoglycemia, feeding difficulties, hyperbilirubinemia, and respiratory distress and/or needed a septic workup. Thirty‐two percent of the infants were bathed during the first 2 hours of life, and by 4 hours, more than two thirds had had their first bath. Fifty‐two percent received kangaroo care during the first 48 hours of lifeNurses may be able to ameliorate some of these health problems through early identification of problems and simple, inexpensive interventions such as avoiding early bathing and promoting kangaroo care.

Late Preterm Sepsis Evaluation Evidence Review

Article NameAuthor/Date of PublicationGrade of EvidenceResultsKey Conclusions
Management of Neonates Born at ≥35 0/7 Weeks' Gestation With Suspected or Proven Early-Onset Bacterial Sepsis20182A3 ways to evaluate >35 wk neonates.  1. Categorical algorithm with intrapartum risk factors. 2. Multivariate risk assessment (sepsis calculator). 3. Serial physical examsBlended approach (sepsis calculator + physical exam) preferred approach
Management of Neonates Born at ≤34. 6/7 Weeks’ Gestation With Suspected or Proven Early-Onset Bacterial Sepsis20182AAll infants in this category are routinely admitted to the NICU. Infants fall into low and high-risk categories. Low risk: OB indication for birth (C-section for maternal indication, lack of labor, no PROM, no non-reassuring fetal status. For low risk infants, reasonable approach to forgo blood culture/antibiotics. High risk: Infant born after efforts to induce labor, and/or with spontaneous labor with concern for infection, or cardiorespiratory distress at birth. Preterm delivery for cervical incompetence, preterm labor, PROM, chorioamnionitis, unexplained non-reassuring fetal status. For high risk infants, draw blood culture and start empiric antibioticsDetermine whether infant born < 35 weeks falls into low or high-risk category. For high risk infant’s empiric blood culture and antibiotics are recommended.
Time to Positivity of Neonatal Blood Cultures for Early-onset SepsisKuzniewicz et al. 20202B71,345 blood cultures obtained at <72 hours of life among 429,442 infants. 68% of cultures positive at 24 hours, 94% positive at 36 hours, 97% positive at 48 hours. Using 36 hours of antibiotics would avoid 3,500 unnecessary doses of antibiotics while delaying antibiotics treatment for 1 infant. Pathogens are isolated by 36 hours after blood culture collection in 94% of neonatal early blood cultures, regardless of maternal antibiotic administration. For antibiotic decisions being made on the basis of blood culture results, the traditional 48-hour period of empiric antibiotic treatment may be decreased to 36 hours. Limiting empiric antibiotic duration to 36 hours could substantially reduce antibiotic exposure among newborns at risk for EOS.
Time to positive blood culture in early onset neonatal sepsis: A retrospective clinical study and review of the literature.Marks et al. 20202A11,432 blood cultures from 66,867 live births. 96.1% positive within 24 hours and 98.1% positive within 36 hours. Also reviewed studies from 1980 to 2020 using search time neonatal sepsis AND blood culture, and included studies that described time to positive blood cultures in early onset sepsis. Excluded studies at centers that only use MANUAL blood cultures. Found 92-100% of blood cultures in EoS were positive within 24 hours of collectionWithout persisting clinical concerns of sepsis, evidence from this study and literature review suggests that 24 h is sufficient incubation time for blood cultures collected from term and late preterm infants with suspected EOS (in hospitals that use automated blood culture systems)

Late Preterm Nutrition Literature Review

Article NameAuthor/Date of PublicationGrade of EvidenceResultsKey Conclusions
Prescribed protein intake does not meet recommended intake in moderate- and late-preterm infants: contribution to weight gain and head growthGerritsen, Lindeboom & Hummel 2020, Nutrition in Clinical PracticeRetrospective175 late preterm infants (gestational age 34-36 6/7) were assessed for prescribed versus recommended protein intake during the first week of life. Weight and head circumference delta Zscore from birth to term corrected age were analyzed using the Fenton preterm growth chart. Protein needs were determined by fetal requirements for normalized intrauterine growth and development.  Prescribed intake was based on feeding protocols for size/age. Actual intake was presumed to match prescribed. Based on analysis for each g/kg/day increase in protein in the first week of life, the corresponding increase in delta weight Zscore was 0.34 SD (p <0.01). Delta head circumference Zscore was +0.25 (P <0.02). Only 19% of late preterm infants met protein goal by 7 days of life (versus 58% of moderately preterm infants). Mean Zscore drop in weight for late preterm infants was 0.7 SD versus 0.2 SD for moderately preterm infants. The majority of moderately preterm infants received fortified enteral feedings whereas the vast majority of late preterm infants received unfortified feeds. Late preterm infants are generally unable to meet recommended protein intakes (3.1 g/kg) based on current feeding practices. Fortification of feeds increases protein provision. Infants who receive better nutrition during the first week in life see significant improvements in weight and head growth at corrected term. 
Nutrition in late preterm infantsAsadi, Bloomfield & Harding. 2019, Seminars in PerinatologyReview/ Expert OpinionPoor nutrient intake is one of the main reasons for inadequate weight gain after birth in late preterm infants. Immaturity of the gastrointestinal tract, immature feeding skills, low breastmilk supply, and lack of hepatic glycogen stores all contribute to difficulty in meeting nutritional requirements. The generally accepted goal of postnatal nutrition is to achieve a growth rate similar to intrauterine growth at the same gestational age, and to reach developmental outcomes similar to infants born at term, though there is a paucity of data on how best to achieve these goals.  Recommendations were created using systematic reviews, expert opinion and reviews of available literature. Level of evidence provided on a scale of 1-5. Human milk fortifier should be utilized in infants receiving donor milk (systematic review- level 1), or infants who are unable to meet needs with maternal milk alone (expert opinion- level 5). Special consideration should be given to infants born <1800 g (expert opinion- level 5) or infants with subnormal weight gains. Targeted fortification is not superior to standard fortification (RTC- level 2). Consider individualized fortification if growth remains insufficient (expert opinion- level 5).  Transitional formula should be provided to infants with subnormal weight gain (review of RTC – level 2). Use of preterm formula may be preferable due to the increased amounts of calories, whey protein, minerals, and improved fatty acid profile, and may be used until 40 weeks corrected age (expert opinion – level 5). Transitional formula may be used for as long as 52 weeks’ postmenstrual age.  Infants with fortified feeds require close monitoring of growth (review of RTC – level 2).  Infant should receive 2-3 mg/kg/d of iron starting at 2-6 weeks of age and continued until 6-12 months (expert opinion – level 5). All infants should receive 400 IU vitamin D daily until 1 year of age regardless of the mode of feeding (formula vs human milk) (systematic review- level 1).   If enteral/oral feeds must be withheld, parenteral nutrition should be provided (expert opinion- level 5).   
Association of first-week nutrient intake and extrauterine growth restriction in moderately preterm infants: a regional population based studyBaillat et al. 2021. NutrientsObservational, multi-centerStudy included 735 infant born at 32-34 6/7 weeks gestational age. Extrauterine growth failure (EUGR) was defined as a delta Zscore drop of >1 SD between birth and hospital discharge. Anthropometrics were analyzed using the Fenton preterm growth chart. 60% of infants with EUGR did not meet recommended protein and energy intakes during the first week of life. The majority of infants with EUGR received unfortified donor milk. Reduced odds were identified with each 10 kcal/kg/d and 1 g/kg/d protein increase.  Decreased protein was most highly associated at 35% (15% for energy). Infants with a gestational age of 34-34 6/7 weeks had the highest incidence of growth failure (56%, p<0.01). Incidence was positively correlated with birth weight.Use of maternal milk should be optimized with early and rapid advancement in volumes as tolerated. Establish nutritional goals in accordance with energy and protein standards for age/size. Extra attention should be paid to infants born larger/older as infants in this population are prone to larger deficits.  Human milk should be fortified within the first few days of life. Preterm formula should be utilized as a breast milk supplementation when needed, especially when infants are taking unfortified feeds at breast. 
Early postnatal care of the moderate-late preterm infant. A framework for practiceBritish Association of Perinatal Medicine. 2023Literature Review/Expert ConsensusModerately preterm and late preterm infants require increased monitoring for the prevention, identification, and management of common morbidities including hypothermia, respiratory distress, infections, hypoglycemia, jaundice and feeding difficulties.  The initial setting for the care of moderately preterm and late preterm infants should be guided by gestational age, weight at birth and known risk factors. Nutritional requirements are relatively greater than those of full term babies, especially in relation to energy, protein, calcium and phosphorus requirements. Babies who are small for gestational age are at greater risk of long-term growth failure. Neonatal length is a primary indicator of neonatal nutrition and forms the basis for important future treatment decisions.Specialized/transitional care is recommended for all infants born ≤ 2000 g/35 weeks gestational age. Mothers of moderately preterm and late preterm infants should be encouraged to breastfeed with additional support as necessary, or provide expressed breast milk. For infants 34 and 36 weeks of gestation or <1800 g, consider human milk fortifiers/nutrient enriched preterm formula/ multivitamin supplementation including vitamin A, vitamin D (for a total daily intake of 340-400 IU including feeds) and iron (at least 2 mg/kg/day if they are under 2kg at birth). Infants receiving fortifier must be closely monitored for growth and for when to reduce/discontinue.   Interpret bilirubin levels according to the baby's postnatal age in hours and manage hyperbilirubinaemia according to the appropriate table and the treatment threshold graphs for gestational age (NICE 2010). Increased monitoring for late preterm infants exclusively breastfeeding/taking reduced amounts of oral feeds.  Provide a clear pathway for contact in case of problems (e.g. jaundice action plan, feeding plan, growth concerns) highlighting readmission criteria. Early discharge of late preterm infants before 24-48 hours is not advised, to allow effective feeding to be established.
Growth of late preterm infants fed nutrient-enriched formula to 120 days of corrected age- a randomized control trialBest et al. 2023, Frontiers in PediatricsRandomized Control, multi-centerInfants born at 34-37 weeks gestational age. All infants were appropriately sized for age (AGA). Infant were randomized into 2 groups. One group received a 22 calorie/oz nutrient-enriched formula developed for preterm infants at discharge, the other group received standard term formula at 20 calories/oz. A third group of exclusively breast fed infants as included as a control.  Early discontinuation of study due to poor sample size. Original study powered to detect a 3 g/day difference in weight gain. Actual study size was 40% of goal. Study outcomes showed an increased gain of 1.77 g in the enriched formula group (non-statistically significant, 95% CI, P=0.31). Oral intake volumes did not differ between the formula groups. Statistically significant outcomes included a 1.8 x increase in 25 OH vitamin D levels and a decrease in respiratory infections (95% CI, p= 0.02). Further research needs to be conducted to determine statistically significant differences in late preterm infants provided 22 calorie/oz nutrient-enriched formula versus standard infant formula, however based on study results, consideration should be given for its use in the interim. Maternal milk continues to be the optimal source of nutrition. 
Mother’s breast milk supplemented with donor milk reduces hospital service usage costs in low birth weight infantsDritsakou et al. 2016, MidwiferyProspective Matching200 low birth weight (LBW) infants were case matched at 1:1 into 2 groups. The first group received maternal milk supplemented with donor milk as needed from birth to hospital discharge. The second group received donor milk for the first 3 weeks of life followed by preterm formula until the time of discharge. Median gestational age/birth weight was not disclosed.  Bovine based human milk fortifier was utilized in both groups for as long as needed to ensure adequate nutrient intake based on size and gestational age. Rates of infection and NEC were not statistically significant between the two groups during hospitalization. Infant who received a combination of donor milk and preterm formula had an average length of stay that was 5 days longer (p <0.001).Outcomes of infants receiving a combination of donor milk and preterm formula did not replicate those of infants receiving maternal milk supplemented with donor milk. A combination of donor milk and formula did not increase the risk of NEC during the sum of the hospital stay. Unable to determine if the use of donor milk in the first three weeks of life decreased NEC rates, particularly in infants with a low NEC risk. 
Feeding the late and moderately preterm infant: A position paper of the ESPGHAN Committee on NutritionESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition: Lapillone et al.   Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Publish Ahead of PrintPosition Statement/Systematic Review>85% agreement made for all conclusions and recommendations. Late/moderately preterm infants have increased nutrition-related neonatal morbidities such as hypoglycemia, poor feeding, and malnutrition in the early neonatal period along with increased hospital readmission rates.  Many postnatal complications are due to inadequate nutrient intake and impaired utilization. Nutrient intake is directly related with weight gains for the first 28 days of life. Late/moderately preterm infants are more likely to have lower rates of weight gains along with decreased quality of growth. Sequelae may include long term feeding issues and impaired neurodevelopment.  Lack of breastfeeding at discharge in late and moderately preterm infants is associated with worse cognitive and behavioral outcomes.  Nutrient requirements are likely somewhere between those of very preterm infants and term infants.Maternal breastfeeding should be encouraged and well supported. Nutrition support needs increase with lower gestational ages and birth weight. Intrauterine growth restriction likely has increased nutritional significance in late preterm versus preterm infants. Proactive nutrition may increase the odds for improved outcomes. Nutrition goals should be aimed at promoting normalized fetal rates of weight growth. Older/larger infants may be able to meet nutritional needs with un-supplemented maternal milk, especially with upregulated volumes. Infants born < 1800 g require fortification. Infants small for gestational age have increased nutritional needs. Moderate/late preterm infants frequently require iron and vitamin D supplementation. Infants born 2000-2499 g should receive 1-2 mg/kg/d iron, infants <2000 g should receive 2-3 mg/kg/d up to 6 months of age.  The exact vitamin D needs are known but likely vary between 400-800IU/day. Likely need for increased DHA/AA and vitamin A provision
Nutritional recommendations for the late-preterm infant and the preterm infant after hospital dischargeLapillone et al. 2013, J PediatricsReviewAuthors outlined the significance of late preterm status and emphasized the increased medical and support needs compared to their term counterparts.  Concerns identified included early cessation of supplemental gavage feeds, insufficient lactation support, and higher than estimated nutritional requirements. Breastfeeding is the preferred feeding option but human milk (particularly donor milk) is likely insufficient to meet needs. Data show that infants with improved postnatal nutritional intake experienced less postnatal weight decline and improved quality of mid-term growth.  Clinical judgement should be applied when determining the benefits of increased nutrition in breast fed infants, and those taking high ad lib volumes of feeds. Extrapolation from data for VLBW and term infants can be made with a reasonable degree of confidence. Use fetal growth as appropriate standard for a particular GA with a focus on lean body mass deposition/symmetrical growth. Adapt estimated needs relative to postconceptional age and size; aim to replicate age-appropriate accretion rates of protein, minerals, and various essential constituents; monitor for postnatal nutrient depletion. Supplementation of maternal milk may be necessary. Utilize nutrient dense formulas (preterm or preterm transitional) in formula fed infants smaller than expected for postmenstrual age until at least 40 weeks corrected age (up to 52 weeks) with an emphasis on infants discharged home <2000 g. Maintain close monitoring of intake/growth to avoid over nutrition in supplemented infants. Discharge vitamin D needs likely match those of term infants. 2 mg/kg/day of iron is recommended via oral supplementation or formula; iron status should be monitored post discharge. Possible need for increased DHA/AA and vitamin A. Need for specialty labs (AP, BUN, ferritin, vitamin D) should be determined on an individual basis
Formula versus donor breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants (review)Quigley, Embleton & McGuire. 2019, Cochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsSystematic ReviewTwelve trials with a total of 1879 infants. Four trials compared standard term formula versus donor breast milk and eight compared nutrient-enriched preterm formula (0.74-0.8 cal/oz) versus donor breast milk. Only the five most recent trials used nutrient-fortified donor milk. Formula-fed infants had higher in-hospital rates of weight gain, linear growth and head growth (95% confidence interval for all 3 parameters). No noted difference in long-term growth or neurodevelopment. Formula feeding increased the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NTT 33).  The GRADE certainty of evidence was moderate for rates of weight gain, linear growth, and head growth (downgraded for high levels of heterogeneity) and was moderate for neurodevelopmental disability, all-cause mortality, and necrotizing enterocolitis (downgraded for imprecision).In preterm and LBW infants, moderate-certainty evidence indicates that feeding with formula (all type) compared with donor breast milk, either as a supplement to maternal expressed breast milk or as a sole diet, results in higher rates of weight gain, along with linear and head growth.  There was an increase in NEC rates in high risk infants fed formula. The trial data do not show an effect on all-cause mortality, or on long-term growth or neurodevelopment.
Mother’s own milk compared with formula milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants: systematic review and meta-analysisStrobel et al. 2022, PediatricsSystematic Review and Meta-analysisForty-two studies enrolling 89 638 infants of low birth weight or gestational age <37 weeks. Study period was January 1, 2011, to October 1, 2021. Only 22 of 42 studies did not restrict enrollment on the basis of gestational age or birth weight. No evidence of an effect of formula usage on mortality (CI 95%), infection (CI 95%), cognitive neurodevelopment (standardized mean difference -1.30, 95% CI), or on growth parameters.  Formula milk feeding increased the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (OR 2.99, 95% CI 1.75–5.11). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation certainty of evidence was low for mortality and necrotizing enterocolitis, and very low for neurodevelopment and growth outcomes.In preterm and low birth weight infants, low to very low-certainty evidence indicates that feeding with infant formula compared with mother’s own milk has little effect on all-cause mortality, infection, growth, or neurodevelopment, and a higher risk of developing necrotizing enterocolitis (low quality evidence). 
Earlier nutrient fortification of breastmilk fed LBW infants improves jaundice related outcomes.Ma et al. 2020, NutrientsRetrospective32-36 week gestational age infants (mean age 34.6/34.3 +/- 1 week) with a birth weight <2.5 kg. 215 infants total included in study.  Maternal milk feeds were fortified with 1 g of protein per 100 ml using a human milk fortifier, formula fed infants were started on preterm formula as fortification. Initial fortification was 160 ml/kg (full volume feeds), interventional fortification was 80 ml/kg (50% feeding volume). Average day of life of fortification for the early group was 3 days (down from ~ 8 days of life).  Infants fortified at 80 ml/kg regained birth weight a median of 1.5 days earlier (p 0.01), were discharged a median of 2.8 days earlier (p 0.03) and experienced 25% less feeding intolerance (p 0.007). There were no associated negative outcomes.  Percent of infants with earlier fortification that required phototherapy was 39% (versus 64%), and percent of infants with a % TSBR ≥250 nmol/L was 5% versus 38% (p values <0.0001).Earlier fortification at 80 ml/kg (50% of goal feeding volume, day of life number 3) using human milk fortifier or preterm formula. decreased bilirubin levels and need for phototherapy. Earlier fortification also improved growth, and decreased length of stay and incidence of feeding intolerance. Earlier fortification increases nutrient provision and likely improves clearance and excretion of bilirubin. 
Vitamin D and parathormone levels of late-preterm formula fed infants during the first year of life.Giapros et al. 2012, European J Clinical NutritionProspective128 infants with a gestational age between 32-36 weeks. Infants were mixed appropriate and small for gestational age (AGA/SGA). 5 infants within the study received preterm transitional formula (3.9%), remaining infants received term formula. Oral volumes were within expected for age (>1000 ml at 3 and 6 months and >600 ml thereafter).  Longitudinal measures of serum 25 OH vitamin D, PTH, calcium, phosphate and alkaline phosphatase were taken at 2 and 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of life.   72% of infants were noted to have deficient levels and 29% had insufficient levels of vitamin D at a minimum of one measurement (P <0.05). The lowest levels of 25 OH vitamin D and highest levels of PTH were noted in the first 3 months of chronological age. SGA infants were more likely to have persistently decreased levels throughout the first year of life.  The highest measured PTH was 46 +/-40 (SGA infants at 2 weeks of life). Mean calcium levels remained >10.1, phosphate >6.4 and AP <400 at all longitudinal measures.Late preterm infants fed formula may not receive an adequate amount of vitamin D and should be considered for supplementation, particularly those born SGA. Late preterm infants should be screened for adequacy of vitamin D by 3 months of age. 
Predictive factors of iron depletion in late preterm infants at the postnatal age of 6 weeksAkkermans et al. 2016, European J Clinical NutritionProspective multi-centerStudy of 68 infants born at 32-35 weeks gestational age with delayed cord clamping. Infants did not receive individualized iron supplementation after birth/discharge. Mean iron intake was 1 mg/kg/day for all infants. Results found that the study population had lower serum ferritin and hemoglobin concentrations at 6 weeks of age compared to their term counter parts. Rates for iron depletion or iron-depleted anemia were 38.2% and 30.9% respectively. Incidence negatively correlated with birth weight/gestational size and positively correlated with the number of blood draws after birth. Late preterm infants have an increased risk for iron depletion/anemia at 6 weeks of age. Infants should receive individualized iron supplementation and monitoring for adequacy of intake. Iron intake becomes a predictive factor of anemia at 2 months of age. 
Poor weight gain and its predictors among preterm neonates admitted at Muhimbili National Hospital in Dar-es-salaam, Tanzania: a prospective cohort studyNdembo et al. 2021, BMCProspective CohortN= 227 (114 late preterm). Proportion of poor weight gain among early and late preterm babies, were 100/113 (88.5%) and 97/114 (85.1%) respectively. Poor weight gain was defined as <15 g/kg/day. Predictors of poor weight gain were low level of maternal education (95%Cl), cup feeding as the initial method of feeding (95%Cl: 1.59–16.24) and delayed initiation of the first feed more than 48 h (95%Cl). Feedings were primarily unfortified maternal milk. Poor weight gain and its predictors among preterm neonates admitted at Muhimbili National Hospital in Dar-es-salaam, Tanzania: a prospective cohort study
Proactive enteral nutrition in moderately preterm small for gestational age infants: A Randomized Clinical TrialZecca et al. 2014, J PediatrRandomized Control TrialSGA infants (n= 72) with a z-score greater than -1.28 below mean for age (estimated <10th%ile); Mean GA 35.5 ±1.2 wks with birth weights >1499 g (mean wt 1754 ±212). Received either a proactive/aggressive feeding advance, starting with 100 mL/kg/day and gradually increased to 200 mL/kg/day by day 4, or a standard feeding regimen, starting with 60 mL/kg/day and gradually increasing to 170 mL/kg/ day by day 9. All infants received human milk (maternal or donor) for a minimum of 1 week of life. Infants were gavage fed with allowable bottle feeds. Infants in the aggressive/proactive feeding group had significantly less weight loss, faster regain of BW, less hypoglycemia, and required less IV fluids. No cases of hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, feeding intolerance, or necrotizing enterocolitis were observed in either group. Delta weight and length z-scores were significantly lower in the proactive/aggressive feeding group, and significantly more infants in the PFR group received their own mother’s milk at discharge Proactive enteral nutrition in moderately preterm small for gestational age infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Outcomes Associated with Type of Milk Supplementation Among Late Preterm Infants Rebecca Mannel, Jennifer D. Peck. 2017. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal NursRetrospective chart reviewThe Length of stay for infants supplemented with either EBM or DBM did not differ significantly from exclusively breastfed infants who received no supplement.  Exclusively formula fed infants had longer LOS than exclusively breastfed infants (3.2 days compared to 2.6 days). Breastfed infants who received any formula supplementation were 16% less likely to continue breastfeeding by day of discharge compared to breastfed infants who received human milk supplementation. Most frequent reason for supplementation – maternal request. Results reveal similar LOS for exclusively breastfed late preterm infants and those supplemented with human milk but significantly higher LOS for formula fed infants Close monitoring is needed regarding infant’s feeding behavior, transfer of milk and normal volume intake to determine when supplementation is medically necessary. Findings suggest human milk supplementation discourages transition to formula feeding before hospital discharge without increasing LOS. 
**Preprint**A Pilot Single-Site Randomized Control Trial: Investigating the Use of Donor Milk in the Late Preterm and Term Infant in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit 

  

Pithia N, Grogan T, Meena G, Kalpashri K, Kalkins K Preprint Feb 2023 

 RCTBreastfeeding attempts increased significantly over time in the MOM+DM group compared to the MOM+Formula group. Growth at multiple time points was similar when the two groups were compared. DM may increase breastfeeding attempts without compromising growth. 
Postnatal length and weight growth velocities according to Fenton reference and their associated perinatal factors in healthy late preterm infants during birth to term-corrected age: an observational studyZhang L, et al. Italian J Peds, 2019.Longitudinal follow-up599 late preterm infants (34-46 wks GA) born at a single center in China from 2014-2017. 56.3% of population was male. 5% were SGA, 3.8% LGA (remaining AGA). The mean weight Zscore was -0.07 SD.  60.8% of infants were exclusively breast fed, 28.9% were partially breast fed and 10.4% were exclusively formula fed. 5.2% of infants received fortified feeds to 2000 g.  Boys experienced faster linear and weight gain velocities. Higher weight gains were positively correlated with SGA status as well as higher GA, and was inversely correlated with LGA status.  Mean delta length Zscore was +0.28;  Mean delta weight Zscore was +0.65. Delta period was birth to corrected term (37.7-42.3 weeks PMA).There is a discordance between the observed weight and length gain velocities compared with the Fenton reference values for age. The largest differences were noticed in SGA and AGA infants who had weight and length gains superior to the reference curve.  Data suggest that the Fenton growth curve may underestimate optimal weight and length velocity – particularly for infants at 34/35 wks GA and below the standard Zscore for age.  Despite the differences, the Fenton growth chart remains the optimal chart for late preterm infants. ±0.67 SD (the difference between major percentile lines) may be the optimal delta for both catch-up and catch-down growth. 

Late Preterm Nutrition Vitamin Literature Review 

Article TitleAuthor & Date of PublicationGrade of Evidence & Type of StudyResultsKey Conclusions
Nutritional Care of Preterm Infants, Scientific Basis and Practice Guidelines, 2nd Edition. Calcium, Magnesium, Phosphorus and Vitamin D. Basel, Hartford: Karger; p122-139Taylor, S.N. Koletzko B, Cheah F-C, Domellof M, Poindexter BB, Vain N, van Goudoever JB, eds 2021

 

Literature Review/Expert Consensus 

For enteral vitamin D… “The AAP recommends 400-1000IU/d and the ESPGHAN recommends 800-1000IU/d for preterm infants.  Infants receiving < 400IU/d from nutrition sources require a supplemental Vitamin D source.”  p135All infants need at least 400IU/d from diet/supplementation. 
Nutritional Care of Preterm Infants, Scientific Basis and Practice Guidelines, 2nd Edition. Microminerals:   Iron, Zinc, Copper, Selenium, Manganese, Iodine, Chromium, and Molybdenum.  Basel, Hartford: Karger; p140-148Domellof, M. Koletzko B, Cheah F-C, Domellof M, Poindexter BB, Vain N, van Goudoever JB, eds. 2021Literature Review/Expert ConsensusFor infants with a birth weight between 1500-2000g, the recommended iron intake is 2mg/kg/d, starting at 2-4 weeks and stopping at 6-12 months.  For infants with a birth weight between 2000-2500g, the recommended iron intake is 1-2mg/kg/d, starting at 4-6 weeks and stopping at 6 months.  The recommended iron intake can be achieved initially by using iron drops, iron-containing human milk fortified or preterm formula.  p142For infants with a BW btw 2000-2500g, the recommended iron intake is 1-2mg/kg/d. Start at 4-6 weeks and stop at 6 months.  Can be achieved using iron drops, iron-fortified human milk or formula. 
Pocket Guide to Neonatal Nutrition, 3rd Edition. Late Preterm Infant  Chicago, IL: Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics p265-280Paul, E. Hodges B.S, Johnson M,  Merlino Barr S.  eds. 2022 Literature Review/Expert Consensus Table 17.2: Nutrient Recommendations for Late Preterm Infant Vitamin D: 400IU/d minimum, perhaps higher Iron: 2-3mg/kg/d. “(Iron) supplementation can be provided as ferrous sulfate or through a multivitamin with iron.   Of note, to achieve the 400IU Vitamin D supplementation with an iron containing multivitamin, 11mg iron is provided, so 1mL will exceed typical recommendation of 2mg/kg/min for infants weighing less than 5.5 kg.” p275

 

Vitamin D: 400IU/d minimum, perhaps higher. Iron: 2-3mg/kg/d. Should be from iron supplement, as multivitamin will provide too much iron for infants < 5.5 kg. 

Feeding the Late and Moderately Preterm Infant: A Position Paper of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Committee on Nutrition JPGN; 69, 259-270

Lapillonne A,   Bronsky J,  Campoy C,  Embleton N,   Fewtrell M,  Fidler Mis N,  Gerasimidis K,  Hojsak I,   Hulst J,  Indrio F,  Molgaard C,   Moltu S.K,  Verduci E, Domellof M,  ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition 2019

 

Systematic Review/Society Paper Review includes late and moderately preterm infants (LMPT), defined as infants between 32 0/7 weeks and 36 6/7 weeks.  Systematic literature search conducted up to April 2018.  Several studies described that LMPT are at risk of early iron deficiency (ID) and iron-deficiency anemia (IDA).  Because deficiencies have been seen, studies suggest that vitamin D supplementation is required from birth in LMPT infants. Further research needed to confirm whether high Vitamin D intakes (800-1000IU/d) are needed or if 400IU/d is adequate For LMPT infants with a BW btw 2000-2500g, the recommended iron intake is 1-2mg/kg/d up to 6 months of age.  For LMPT infants with a BW < 2000g, the recommended iron intake is 2-3mg/kg/d at least up to 6 months of age. *does not specify when to start iron.  LMPT infants require a daily Vitamin D supplement of at least 400IU/d throughout ‘early childhood.’
Early Postnatal Care of the Moderate-Late Preterm Infant: A Framework for Practice, January 2023British Association of Perinatal Medicine 2022Literature review / expert consensus / society paper Includes late and moderately preterm infants (LMPT), defined as infants between 32 0/7 weeks and 36 6/7 weeks. “Late and moderately preterm infants weighing < 2500g at birth should receive 1-2mg/kg/d of iron up to 6 months of age, and those weighing < 2000g should receive 2-3mg/kg/d of iron at least up to 6 months of age.” p16. “Late and moderately preterm infants require a daily Vitamin D supplement of at least 400IU/d throughout early childhood.” p16. “There is no evidence to suggest that preterm babies require a greater amount than this.   All predominately fed breast fed babies should receive this; for formula fed babies sufficient vitamin D may be provided without additional supplementation.” p26For LMPT infants with a BW btw 2000-2500g, the recommended iron intake is 1-2mg/kg/d up to 6 months of age. For LMPT infants with a BW < 2000g, the recommended iron intake is 2-3mg/kg/d at least up to 6 months of age. *does not specify when to start iron. LMPT infants require a daily Vitamin D supplement of at least 400IU/d throughout ‘early childhood.’
Iron Supplements Reduce the Risk of Iron Deficiency Anemia in Marginally Low Birth Weight Infants. Pediatrics. 126(4): e874-e883Berglund S, Westrup B, Domeloff M. 2010Randomized control trial In RCT, 285 healthy marginally low birth weight (MLBW, defined as 2000-2500g) infants assigned to receive iron supplements at dose of 0, 1 or 2mg/kg/d between 6 weeks and 6 months of age. Iron supplement provided as ferrous succinate mixture. Labs, growth and morbidity monitored.   “Iron supplementation resulted in significant dose dependent effects on hgb and all iron status indicators at 6 months.  The prevalence of ID at 6 months was 36% in placebo group, 8.2% in 1mg/kg/d group and 3.8% in the 2mg/kg/d group (p < 0.001).  The prevalence rates of IDA were 9.9%, 2.7% and 0%, respectively (p < 0.004).  Among infants exclusively breastfed at 6 weeks, the prevalence of IDA was 18% in the placebo group.  There were no significant differences between groups in growth or morbidity.”   Of note, this study included MLBW infants and did not specific inclusion criteria on the gestational age.  The average gestational age of infants included in study was 36.6 wks ± 1.7 SD. 

 

 

MLBW infants have relatively high risks of ID and IDA, especially if they are breastfed.   Iron supplementation at 2mg/kg/d from 6 weeks to 6 months reduces this risk effectively with no short-term adverse effects on morbidity or growth. 

Nutritional Recommendations for the Late-Preterm Infant and the Preterm Infant after Hospital Discharge Journal of Pediatrics, 162:S90-100Lapillone A, O’Connor D.L, Wang D, Rigo J 2013Literature reviewPaper includes preterm and LPT infants and does not separate recommendations.  Vitamin D: “There is no evidence that preterm infants should receive greater doses than term infants after discharge to maintain normal plasma 25-hydroxy vitamin D concentration.” Iron: “The AAP and ESPGHN recommend that preterm infants receive iron supplements for up to a year after discharge.  The AAP recommends at least 2mg/kg/day, which is the amount of iron provided by iron fortified formulas.  Preterm infants fed human milk should receive an iron supplement of 2mg/kg/day by 1 month of age, and this should be continued until the infant is weaned to iron-fortified formula or begins eating complementary foods that supplement 2mg/kg of iron per day.

 

 

Preterm infants should receive iron supplementation of 2mg/kg/d by 1 month of age until meeting needs from complementary food or iron-fortified formula.  *no specifications about LPT infants 

Vitamin D in Preterm and Full-Term Infants. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism,76(suppl 2):6-14Abrams, S.A. 2020Literature reviewResearch and most guidelines recommend an intake of 400IU/day of Vitamin D to ensure adequate bone health in preterm and full-term infants. It is best to start supplementation as early as possible – “within the first few weeks of life if not within the first few days.”  Infant formula contains Vitamin D and most infants will reach an intake of 400IU/day within the first 2 months of life if they are routinely consuming cows-milk based infant formula. Infants fed human milk should receive a Vitamin D supplement of 400IU/d.  Infant fed formula should receive a Vitamin D supplement of 400IU/d until meeting needs from formula. 
Nutrition in Late Preterm Infants Seminars in Perinatology, 43Asadi S, Bloomfield F.H, Harding J.E 2019Literature review ESPGHAN recommend that iron supplementation of 2-3mg/kg/d should start at 2-6 weeks of age in preterm infants and continue until 6-12 months of age, depending on infant’s diet.  Iron can be provided as medicinal iron or through iron-fortified complementary food.   However, both standard preterm infant formulas and standard term infant formulas can provide enough iron.   As a result, supplementation is only required until the infant is receiving iron-fortified formula or begins eating complementary foods containing sufficient iron.” All infants birth to 12 months of age should receive 400IU/d of Vitamin D supplements, independent of their mode of feeding.   Iron: Supplementation of 2-3mg/kg/d should start at 2-6 weeks of age in preterm infants and continue until 6-12 months of age, depending on infant’s diet. Vitamin D: all infants should receive supplement of 400IU/d 
Policy Statement: Breastfeeding and Use of Human Milk Pediatrics, 150(1):e2022057988Meek J.Y, Noble L Policy statement “To maintain an adequate serum Vitamin D concentrations, all infants consuming less than 28 ounces of commercial infant formula per day routinely should receive an oral supplement of Vitamin D 400IU per day beginning at hospital discharge and throughout breastfeeding.”  Infants fed human milk should receive a Vitamin D supplement of 400IU/d.  Infant fed formula should receive a Vitamin D supplement of 400IU/d until receiving >28 ounces per day of formula. 

Sources Late Preterm Care Guidelines

Admissions Criteria 

Reiss J et al. Short-Term Outcomes following Standardized Admission of Late Preterm Infants to Family-Centered Care.  Am J Perinatol 2021;38:131–139

Lockyear C et al. Trends in morbidities of late preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. Journal of Perinatology 2023 Nov;43(11):1379-1384

Zupancic J et al. Using the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Wisely: A National Survey of Clinicians Regarding Practices for Lower-Acuity Care. J Pediatr 2023 Feb:253:165-172.e1

Edwards et al. Variation in Use by NICU Types in the United States. Pediatrics, Volume 142, number 5, November 2018:e2018045

Natile et al. Short-term respiratory outcomes in late preterm infants. Italian Journal of Pediatrics 2014, 40-52

Newman et al. NICU Versus Mother/Baby Unit Admissions for Low-Acuity Infants Born at 35 Weeks’ Gestation. Pediatrics, Volume 151, number 4, April 2023:e2022056861

Congdon et al. Admission and Care Practices in United States Well Newborn Nurseries. Hospital Pediatrics, Volume 13, Issue 3, March 2023

Late Preterm Thermoregulation 

Fulmer et al. Intensive Care Neonates and Evidence to Support the Elimination of Hats for Safe Sleep. Adv Neonatal Care 2020 Jun;20 (3): 229-232. 

Late Preterm Sepsis Evaluation Evidence

Sanchez et al. Short-course empiric antibiotic therapy for possible early-onset sepsis in the NICU. Journal of Perinatology (2023) 43:741 – 745

Marks et al. Time to positive blood culture in early onset neonatal sepsis: A retrospective clinical study and review of the literature. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 56 (2020) 1371–1375.

Puopolo et al. Management of Neonates Born at ≤34 6/7 Weeks’ Gestation With Suspected or Proven Early-Onset Bacterial Sepsis. Pediatrics; volume 142, number 6, December 2018 

Puopolo et al. Estimating the Probability of Neonatal Early-Onset Infection on the Basis of Maternal Risk Factor. Pediatics; Volume 128, Number 5, November 2011.

Late Preterm Hyperbilirubinemia Literature

Slaughter et al. Technical Report: Diagnosis and Management of Hyperbilirubinemia in the Newborn Infant 35 or More Weeks of Gestation. Pediatrics; Volume 150, number 3, September 2022:e2022058865.

Late Preterm Apnea and Bradycadia, Discharge Planning Literature Review

Lorch et al. Epidemiology of Apnea and Bradycardia Resolution in Premature Infants. Pediatrics; Volume 128, Number 2, August 2011

Eichenwald. Apnea of Prematurity. Pediatrics; Volume 137, number 1, January 2016:e2015375

Canadian Paediatric Society. Paediatr Child Health Vol 5 No 1 January/February 2000

Antenatal Steroids and Late Preterm Neonates Literature

Vidaeff et al. Updating the balance between benefits and harms of antenatal corticosteroids. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology FEBRUARY 2023

Gabriele Saccone,1 Vincenzo Berghella. Antenatal corticosteroids for maturity of term or near term fetuses: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMJ 2016;355:i5044.

C. Gyamfi-Bannerman et al. Antenatal Betamethasone for Women at Risk for Late Preterm Delivery. N Engl J Med 2016 Apr 7; 374(14): 1311–1320.

A. Familiari et al. Antenatal corticosteroids and perinatal outcome in late fetal growth restriction: analysis of prospective cohort. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023; 61: 191–197.

Deshmukh et al. Neonatal outcomes by delivery indication after administration of antenatal late preterm corticosteroids. AJOG Global Reports November 2022.

Late Preterm Bathing Literature

American Academy of Pediatrics. (2017). Guidelines for Perinatal Care (8th ed.). Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics

Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric, and Neonatal Nurses (2018). Neonatal skin care: Evidence-based clinical practice guideline (4th ed., pp. 41-49). 

Bedwell, S., & Holtzclaw, B. J. (2022). Early Interventions to Achieve Thermal Balance in Term Neonates. Nursing for women's health, 26(5), 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nwh.2022.07.006

Loring, C., Gregory, K., Gargan, B., LeBlanc, V., Lundgren, D., Reilly, J., Stobo, K., Walker, C., & Zaya, C. (2012). Tub bathing improves thermoregulation of the late preterm infant. Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN, 41(2), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2011.01332.x

Nolt,D., O’Leary, S. T., Aucott, S. W. ; COMMITTEE ON INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN (2022). Risks of Infectious Diseases in Newborns Exposed to Alternative Perinatal Practices. Pediatrics,149 (2): e2021055554. 10.1542/peds.2021-055554

Sun, X., Xu, J., Zhou, R., Liu, B., & Gu, Z. (2023). Effectiveness of different bathing methods on physiological indexes and behavioral status of preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC pediatrics, 23(1), 507. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04280-y

Taşdemir, H. İ., & Efe, E. (2019). The effect of tub bathing and sponge bathing on neonatal comfort and physiological parameters in late preterm infants: A randomized controlled trial. International journal of nursing studies99, 103377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.06.008

Taşdemir, H. İ., & Efe, E. (2021). The effect of delaying first bathing on skin barrier function in late preterm infants: A study protocol for multi-centre, single-blind RCT. Journal of advanced nursing77(2), 1051–1061. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14657

Warren, S., Midodzi, W. K., Allwood Newhook, L. A., Murphy, P., & Twells, L. (2020). Effects of Delayed Newborn Bathing on Breastfeeding, Hypothermia, and Hypoglycemia. Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN49(2), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2019.12.004

WHO Recommendation on Newborn Health: Guidelines approved by the WHO Guidelines Review Committee. (2017). World Health Organization.

Jump back to top