News & Views: Public Perceptions of Science and Their Role in Health Decision-Making
Published on
Vaccine Update for Healthcare ProvidersPublished on
Vaccine Update for Healthcare ProvidersIf you regularly read this newsletter, science is likely central to your profession. You might collect data in the form of vital signs, describe the symptoms of a disease, calculate proper medication dosing, or work to contain an outbreak. Regardless, you likely have some understanding of how science is done and how we arrived at the knowledge that underlies your profession.
But, do you ever think about current public perceptions of science or the science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) workforce? Having an understanding of the overall climate and social norms related to science can be helpful. For example, it helps to recall that even if most people had science at some point during their education, they may not remember much about it, especially if they don’t have related careers. This educational history can affect how people receive and process science-based information, like health decisions.
Recently, three publications provided insights into what the public thinks about science, how the COVID-19 pandemic changed the situation, and how these perceptions can influence health-related decision-making. The first two, “The State of U.S. Science and Engineering 2024” and “Science and Technology: Public Perceptions, Awareness, and Information Sources,” were published by the National Science Board (NSB) of the National Science Foundation (NSF). The first of these is a summary report, and the second is one of nine thematic reports. These two publications, along with the other thematic reports and an online data tool, comprise a biennial report, known as “Science and Engineering Indicators” that the NSB is required to submit to the president and Congress. The third publication, “Trends in U.S. public confidence in science and opportunities for progress,” was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). So, let’s look at where things stand when it comes to the public perception of science.
Note: Links to each of these are in the “Resources” section of this article.
This 52-page report focuses on three areas, including the STEM workforce (referred to as talent), research and development (referred to as discovery), and invention and innovation (referred to as translation). The data presented span a range of years and compile findings from multiple sources. Some key findings and areas of interest for our purposes include:
Other sections of this report may be of interest for those who want to know more about the STEM workforce, contributors to research and development, which countries publish the most peer-reviewed research papers, the subject areas of research papers by country, the fields and geographic regions of patent filing classifications, and manufacturing by country.
As the title suggests, this 47-page report focused more deeply on public perceptions of science, including a more detailed look at whether people differentiate between scientists and engineers, their thoughts about scientific topics, their understanding of how science is done, where they get scientific information, and how often they engage in scientific activities. Some key considerations related to delivery of healthcare or health- and science-related communications include these points:
The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) created a Strategic Council for Research Excellence, Integrity, and Trust to evaluate public confidence and the factors that influence these feelings. This paper summarizes the findings of their efforts, which began in 2022. While public confidence in science is high compared with other institutions, confidence in all institutions has decreased over the past five years. Like the “Science and Engineering Indicators,” the Strategic Council also relied on data from multiple sources to draw conclusions. Some of the relevant findings for our focus include:
Realizing that not everyone has the same level of understanding about and confidence in science is important for informing conversations and other forms of communication based on scientific knowledge. In particular:
Check the March 2024 “On the Bookshelf” article for a related publication based on a recent Summit held by the National Academy of Sciences.
Contributed by: Charlotte A. Moser, MS, Paul A. Offit, MD
Categories: Vaccine Update March 2024, News and Views About Vaccines
Materials in this section are updated as new information and vaccines become available. The Vaccine Education Center staff regularly reviews materials for accuracy.
You should not consider the information in this site to be specific, professional medical advice for your personal health or for your family's personal health. You should not use it to replace any relationship with a physician or other qualified healthcare professional. For medical concerns, including decisions about vaccinations, medications and other treatments, you should always consult your physician or, in serious cases, seek immediate assistance from emergency personnel.