Skip to main content

Ryan L. Ruiz, MD, MS

About Ryan L. Ruiz, MD, MS

Titles

Attending Physician, Pediatric Otolaryngology

Assistant Professor, Department of Otorhinolaryngology: Head & Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania

Education & training

Graduate Degree

MS in Clinical Investigation - New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY

Medical Degree

MD - New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY

Residency

Otolaryngology - New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY

Fellowship

Pediatric Otolaryngology - Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA

Publications

Publications

2022

Ruiz R, Balamuth N, Javia LR, Zur KB: Systemic bevacizumab treatment for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: long-term follow-up. Laryngoscope Jan 19 2022. Notes: doi: 10.1002/lary.30021. Epub ahead of print.

Ruiz R, Balamuth N, Javia LR, Zur KB: Systemic bevacizumab treatment for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: long-term follow-up. Laryngoscope 132(10): 2071-2075, Oct 2022. Notes: doi: 10.1002/lary.30021. Epub ahead of print.

2021

Ruiz R, Kazahaya K: Global Respiratory Infections. Bailey's Head & Neck Surgery: Otolaryngology, 6th ed. Rosen CA, Gray S, Ha P, Limb C, Park S, Richter G (eds.). Wolters Kluwer Health, 2021-22. Notes: Publisher review/In press.

2018

Ahmed O, Gallant S, Ruiz R, Wang B, Shapiro WH, Voigt EP. Validity of the Hum Test, a Simple and Reliable Alternative to the Weber Test. Submitted. Laryngoscope. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2018 Jun;127(6):402-405. doi: 10.1177/0003489418772860.

Benedict PA, Ruiz R, Yoo M, Verma A, Ahmed OH, Wang B, Dion GR, Voigt A, Merati A, Rosen CA, Amin MR, Branski RC. Laryngeal distribution of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis in a previously untreated cohort. Laryngoscope. 2018 Jan;128(1):138-143.

2017

Benedict PA, Ruiz R, Verma A, Dion GR, Oh P, Wang B, Ahmed OH, Hiwatashi N, Bing R, Victor K, Hu KS, Johnson A, Branski RC, Amin MR. The effects of concurrent chemoradiation therapy to the base of tongue in a preclinical model. Laryngoscope. 2017 Dec 27.

2015

Taliercio S, Cespedes M, Born H, Ruiz R, Roof S, Amin MR, Branski RC. Adult-onset recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: a review of disease pathogenesis and implications for patient counseling. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Jan;141(1):78-83.

2014

Born H, Ruiz R, Verma A, Taliercio S, Achlatis S, Pitman M, Gandonu S, Bing R, Amin MR, Branski RC. Concurrent oral human papilloma virus infection in patients with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: a preliminary study. Laryngoscope. 2014 Dec;124(12):2785-90.

Ruiz R, Achlatis S, Verma A, Born H, Kapadia F, Fang Y, Pitman M, Sulica L, Branski RC, Amin MR. Risk factors for adult-onset recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. Laryngoscope. 2014 Oct;124(10):2338-44.

Ruiz R, Jeswani S, Andrews K, Rafii B, Paul BC, Branski RC, Amin MR. Hoarseness and laryngopharyngeal reflux: a survey of primary care physician practice patterns. JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery 2014; 140:192-196.

Ruiz R, Achlatis S, Sridharan S, Wang B, Fang Y, Branski RC, Amin MR. The effect of antireflux therapy on phonomicrosurgical outcomes: a preliminary retrospective study. Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation 2014; 28:241-244.

Govil N, Rafii BY, Paul BC, Ruiz R, Amin MR, Branski RC. Glucocorticoids for vocal fold disease: a survey of otolaryngologists. Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation 2014; 28:82-87

2013

Sridharan S, Achlatis S, Ruiz R, Jeswani S, Fang Y, Branski RC, Amin MR. Patient-based outcomes of in-office KTP ablation of vocal fold polyps. The Laryngoscope 2013.

Rafii B, Taliercio S, Achlatis S, Ruiz R, Amin MR, Branski RC. Incidence of underlying laryngeal pathology in patients initially diagnosed with laryngopharyngeal reflux. The Laryngoscope 2013.

Patient experience rating

(based on 211 submissions)

  • Provider listened carefully
    4.6 of 5
  • Trust provider with care
    4.6 of 5
  • Provider gave enough info about child's health
    4.7 of 5
  • Would recommend the provider
    4.7 of 5
Learn about the patient experience rating system

Comments

  • Dr. Ruiz is great, great care, great bedside manner and no concerns.

    5 of 5
    Jul 17, 2026
  • Dr. Ruiz was very honest about treatment and what we needed to do and I sincerely appreciated that

    5 of 5
    Jul 10, 2026
  • Dr. Ruiz was very thorough. He listened to my questions, looked through the medical information, and gave us the best outcome that he thought for my child.

    5 of 5
    Jul 10, 2026
  • Wonderful experience each visit. Patient, kind, knowledgeable, and supportive of our child's needs. Dr. Ruiz has been a tremendous help with our son.

    5 of 5
    Jun 18, 2026
  • Dr Ruiz very kind and proficient to his job

    5 of 5
    Jun 12, 2026
  • Talked to my grandson, explained what he was doing & why.

    5 of 5
    Jun 12, 2026
  • The provider was great.

    5 of 5
    Jun 11, 2026
View more comments View less comments

About the Patient Experience Rating System

The patient experience rating is an average of all responses to the care provider-related questions from surveys submitted by patient families and verified by our survey partner National Research Corporation (NRC Health), an independent company that specializes in patient experience. Patients that are treated in outpatient or hospital environments may receive different surveys, and the volume of responses will vary by question. Responses are measured using percent positive scoring. Percent positive is the percentage of respondents who answered with the most desirable response. We are committed to transparency and sharing the voices of our patients and families. Comments are reviewed before posting to ensure accuracy, privacy, and relevance. To provide meaningful feedback, comments are displayed on provider profiles once a sufficient number have been received. All feedback is also shared internally to support learning, recognition, and continuous improvement. The comments reflect the experiences and perspectives of the patients and families who submitted them. The comments are not endorsed by and do not reflect the views of Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.

Jump back to top